[ 陳曉航 ]——(2008-12-12) / 已閱28083次
參考文獻(xiàn)：
[1]陳忠林.刑法（分論）[M].北京:中國人民大學(xué)出版社,2003:205
[2]廣東省廣州市中級(jí)人民法院.刑事判決書（2008）穗中法刑二重字第2號(hào)
[3]鄭娟,趙巖林.電子代理人法律問題探析[J].政法論壇，2004,(1).
[4]王利明.電子商務(wù)法研究[M].北京:中國法制出版社，2003:95
[5]張明楷.刑法學(xué)（第三版）[M].北京:法律出版社，2007:55
[6]魏振瀛.民法[M].北京：北京大學(xué)出版社，2000:169
[7]王利明.電子商務(wù)法研究[M].北京:中國法制出版社，2003:95
Legal thought on the new trial judgment of “the Xu Ting case”
Chen Xiao-hang
（Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065 ,China）
Abstract: on March 31, 2008, Guangzhou Intermediate people's court has the new trial of “the Xu Ting case”, and made a judgment which decided the accused person Xu Ting committed the larceny. We argue that Xu Ting should be innocent, because the court’s judgment that Xu Ting's behavior constituted larceny is unreasonable. “The Xu Ting case” brought out some new legal problems, therefore, we must legislate to consummate as soon as possible, so as to adapt the high speed development of the science and technology.
Key words: the Xu Ting case; new trial judgment; larceny; electronic agent
總共3頁 [1] [2] 3
上一頁
